Working draft. The text and tools are still being checked, and corrections are welcome.

2007 · New York

Generative Assessment: Three Models for Learning from our Programs

Session E.16

Area: Composition/Writing Programs · family: Writing programs and administration

RoleName as printedAffiliation as printedPaper
Chair Carolyn Miller North Carolina State University, Raleigh → North Carolina State University
Speakers Ann Penrose North Carolina State University, Raleigh → North Carolina State University Are We Teaching What We Think We Are? Generative Assessment of a First-Year Writing Program
Speakers Roy Stamper North Carolina State University, Raleigh → North Carolina State University Are We Teaching What We Think We Are? Generative Assessment of a First-Year Writing Program
Speakers David Covington North Carolina State University, Raleigh → North Carolina State University Faculty and Student Perceptions of Distance-Education versus Classroom Instruction in a Professional Writing Program
Speakers Michael Carter North Carolina State University, Raleigh → North Carolina State University What Does Assessment Indicate about the Value of Writing? Learning from Outcomes-based Assessment of Writing in the Disciplines

Source

NCTE's program, near page 136 of the file. Names link to a person page only for people listed at two or more conventions.

Cite as: Conference on College Composition and Communication. “Generative Assessment: Three Models for Learning from our Programs.” 2007 Convention Program, New York, session E.16. Via CCCC Program Reader, November 2, 2026.