Working draft. The text and tools are still being checked, and corrections are welcome.

2014 · Indianapolis

Machine Assessment of the Essays/Essays of the Machine Assessment: Perspectives on the Role of Machine Grading in the Writing Classroom and Its

Session J.22

Area: Teaching Writing & Rhetoric · family: Teaching and pedagogy

RoleName as printedAffiliation as printedPaper
Chair James Heiman St. Cloud State University, MN → St. Cloud State University
Speakers Matt Barton St. Cloud State University, MN → St. Cloud State University That Does not Compute!: Lessons Learned/Unlearned from the History and Discourse of Computer-Based Writing Assessment
Speakers James Heiman St. Cloud State University, MN → St. Cloud State University That Does not Compute!: Lessons Learned/Unlearned from the History and Discourse of Computer-Based Writing Assessment
Speakers Jason Tham St. Cloud State University, MN → St. Cloud State University ‘Is There a Robot in This Class?’: The Mechanization of Student, Teacher, and Text in the Writing Classroom
Speakers Jack Hennes St. Cloud State University, MN → St. Cloud State University The Techno-Realists’ Manifesto: How I Learned to Live with Machine Grading while Preserving Rhetorical Education in the Writing Classroom

Source

NCTE's program, near page 243 of the file. Names link to a person page only for people listed at two or more conventions.

Cite as: Conference on College Composition and Communication. “Machine Assessment of the Essays/Essays of the Machine Assessment: Perspectives on the Role of Machine Grading in the Writing Classroom and Its.” 2014 Convention Program, Indianapolis, session J.22. Via CCCC Program Reader, November 3, 2026.